The Phylmar Group, Inc.
1) Objectives
Develop a system to select and prioritize sites for environmental, health, and safety (EHS) audits
Why?
– Cannot audit all operations
– Need to set priorities based on risk management concepts
System should:
– Apply standard criteria to all sites and prioritization decisions
– Generate reproducible results
– Consider quantitative and qualitative data
2) System Concepts
System rates each audit site according to types of risk….
– Inherent risk (IR): fixed due to nature of operations
– Manageable risk (MR): changeable due to management
…..and risk control activities
– Risk control (RC): EHS programs
Audit site rating is derived from formula:
0.4*[IR] + 0.6*[(MR) – 0.5*(RC)]
For each type of risk, priority groups are established and weighted within the audit site rating formula to reflect potential impacts to operations, people, and environment
Parameter rankings within priority groups are assigned, averaged, and weighted to achieve audit site rating. Some of the parameters include number of years site has been operational, population density within one mile of the site, and number of fatalities since the last audit.
3) Step-by-Step Use
Inputs: Questionnaire for each audit site
Definitions and rankings fo parameters
Spreadsheet with priority formulas
For each audit site:
1. Select ranking for each parameter
2. Enter parameter rankings in spreadsheet
3. Calculate audit site ranking
4. Repeat for all audit sites
5. Compare ratings and assign order and frequency to audit activities
4) System Customization
System can be customized to reflect audit program goals
Rating formula, priority groups, and parameters can be changed
– Content
– Definitions
– Additional Risks (e.g., transportation, product safety)
System can be placed in framework of EHS management systems